Status
Not open for further replies.

eoghanmccabe

New Member
Trying to capitalise on the fact that there are loads of crap Web designers out there isn't big, hard or clever.

Bingo. And that's the only reason the SEO "industry" exists. Because there are so many negligent, irresponsible and—as Ken put it—crap designers and developers out there.
 

gav240z

New Member
Can you imagine though?

There was me thinking it was because of the methods used by Search Engines to index and list websites, not the fact there are so many bad developers/designers.

But can you imagine if search engines indexed anything and everything? We would be stuck with Flash websites and Tabled Design. I can only imagine the pain.

Not to mention ugly url's and session ID's, no thanks. Oh and have you seen the junk Microsoft used to allow in websites with Frontpage?

It would have been code and tag soup of the propietry kind. I for one am glad that search engine such as Google took a stand and said, "you know what?" if you want to get listed in here you need to follow some kind of web standards.

Yay! for standards :)
 

RedCardinal

New Member
That's a load of bull.
Seconded.

Eoghan I personally think you are so wide of the mark that I decided not to even engage you on your post. If you really believe you're own words it's no wonder you're not selling 'SEO'.

Pray tell how your theory stacks up in ultra-competitive niches where all the top sites have excellent design and content? There are only 10 positions on page 1 - how does Google decide which to elevate to #1? The nicest design? The cleanist code? I'm all ears to hear your designer best practice solution to that little issue.
 

mneylon

Administrator
Staff member
The reason the SEO industry exists is because the design industry ignored search.
It would exist anyway, as Richard points out.

Online insurance
Mortgage brokers
Travel portal
Hotel booking sites

There are LOTS of them. It doesn't matter a damn how well designed they are when it comes to SEO, as only 1 can be at the top for the search phrase that people use. And that is the key - people search for things using really insane keyphrases. How is design going to deal with that? or with people's inability to spell.

I could go on.
 

georgiecasey

New Member
exactly. designers think seo is just well structured, good titles and that's it. seo is a results based business, you're in the first page or not.
 

Redfly

New Member
Seconded.

Eoghan I personally think you are so wide of the mark that I decided not to even engage you on your post. If you really believe you're own words it's no wonder you're not selling 'SEO'.

Pray tell how your theory stacks up in ultra-competitive niches where all the top sites have excellent design and content? There are only 10 positions on page 1 - how does Google decide which to elevate to #1? The nicest design? The cleanist code? I'm all ears to hear your designer best practice solution to that little issue.

I couldn't agree more and that's why I didn't bother participate either.
 

Cormac

New Member
Does anyone else think it's weird that Eoghan is linking to wikipedia in almost every one of his posts...?

And also that one of his posts lists every design/development firm in Ireland?

Eoghan, your SEO is bull****.
 

EdenWeb

Member
Trying not to get involved too but I've one serious question. Does that mean that all your previous SEO clients will be refunded your fees?
 

TheMenace

New Member
A question for the SEO's if I may: Should the companies who can afford to throw a lot of money at SEO dominate Google while others, although they may have more relevant content, fail to rank well? Doesn't anyone see this as a looming risk that threatens to completely destroy search altogether? Guess what happens when Google's organic listings are effectively paid for and aren't necessarily delivering the most relevant results for their users? That's right...
 

Forbairt

Teaching / Designing / Developing
A question for the SEO's if I may: Should the companies who can afford to throw a lot of money at SEO dominate Google while others, although they may have more relevant content, fail to rank well? Doesn't anyone see this as a looming risk that threatens to completely destroy search altogether? Guess what happens when Google's organic listings are effectively paid for and aren't necessarily delivering the most relevant results for their users? That's right...

Not an SEO person as such ... but isn't that what Search Wikia - search - a Wikia wiki is all about ... ? getting search back into .. human hands ... ?

Is coke the best caffeinated drink or does it simply throw so much money at advertising (santa claus being red for example) that it takes over ?
 

RedCardinal

New Member
A question for the SEO's if I may: Should the companies who can afford to throw a lot of money at SEO dominate Google while others, although they may have more relevant content, fail to rank well? Doesn't anyone see this as a looming risk that threatens to completely destroy search altogether? Guess what happens when Google's organic listings are effectively paid for and aren't necessarily delivering the most relevant results for their users? That's right...
Ken I can think of no other online medium that empowers people with websites at all levels to compete regardless of financial resources. Of all web channels to level your argument against I think organic search is perhaps the least relevant.
 

TheMenace

New Member
I don't pretend to understand what you're saying, Richard. Suffice to say that there is a growing dependency to throw money at the ranking problem/SEO which will lead to the increased commercialisation of organic search in many sectors. So financial resources are a factor in being able to compete, no?
 

Forbairt

Teaching / Designing / Developing
I don't pretend to understand what you're saying, Richard. Suffice to say that there is a growing dependency to throw money at the ranking problem/SEO which will lead to the increased commercialisation of organic search in many sectors. So financial resources are a factor in being able to compete, no?

(How I understand it)

I don't think so ... I think links / quality of content / meta play a major factor ... though getting all this together does require a considerable amount of money whether its your own time or someone elses.

If you're talking about PPC then yes throw 5EUR at each hit and you'll get nearly every hit for the topics of choice (how I understand it again)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top